It depends on the size of the country.
It all depends on the size of the country.
Nuclear bombs are often thought of as being capable of destroying an entire country. That being said, this is not always the case. The size of the country is a major factor in determining whether or not a nuclear bomb would be able to destroy it.
One example could be that, a nuclear bomb would have little effect on a country the size of Australia. This is because the vast majority of the country would not be affected by the blast. In contrast, a nuclear bomb could easily destroy a small country like Monaco.
Can you survive a nuclear bomb in a fridge?
The reality is that smaller countries are more likely to be destroyed than larger ones, because they have less mass, and therefore less energy to absorb the shockwave.
There are larger countries such as Russia that are large enough to survive a nuclear blast. In reality, the feeling of the blast would be on the lines of an earthquake and produce some black smoke for a few weeks, but it wouldn’t be totally destroyed.
How Deep Underground To Survive A Nuclear Blast?
The main reason as to why smaller countries are more likely to get wiped out by an atomic bomb. This can be seen in the following: the energy from its explosion will reach them faster than those in larger countries. What this means is that smaller countries would need more time before they can re-establish themselves. It could easily take could take decades or even centuries!
It depends on the landscape.
People tend to think of nuclear bombs and they often imagine a world-ending scenario in which the entire planet is engulfed in an apocalyptic firestorm. This in reality regarding nuclear bombs, is far from that. In that, they are highly targeted weapons that can only cause widespread destruction if used in densely populated areas.
This is why the vast majority of the possible targets of an attack would be large cities. The affects would be the the leveling of buildings and killing of hundreds of thousands of people(if not more). That being said, a nuclear bomb detonated in a rural area would have far less of an impact.
This is because nuclear bombs create large amounts of heat and energy when they detonate, so the size of the target is important. The larger the target, the more destruction a nuclear bomb can cause. Therefore, a nuclear bomb can destroy a whole country, but it depends on the landscape. If the country is mostly rural, the damage would be much less than if it was mostly urban.
The landscape plays a key factor.
While nuclear bombs can have devastating effects on all countries, it may be possible for a country to escape destruction if its landscape is particularly interesting and/or large enough to absorb the bomb’s effects.
If the country has the military infrastructure in place to take down or lessen the bomb’s impact then that lessens the overall impact of the bomb. In comparison, if you are looking at a third-world country their chances would be far less, as their military capabilities of lessening the attack would be minimal or non-existent. When a country can not fight back at the same level of force, that may result in a secondary attack.
It depends on whether or not the country has access to nuclear weapons.
The vast majority of countries do not have their own nuclear bombs because they’re very expensive and difficult to make. That being said, the countries that have the most are America, Russia, and China. They have make up the lion’s share of nuclear bombs.
A nuclear bomb is a very powerful weapon, but it won’t destroy a whole country.
You’ve probably heard of nuclear weapons, it is not straightforward about how powerful they are as well as what effects they can have. Yes, these kinds of weapons have been used before. They pose a major threat to global security on all levels for the horrible damage that they can cause.
The answer can a nuclear bomb destroy an entire country?
The answer is no, only if it is small enough as mentioned in the first part of this article. That being said, there will be a large loss of life and destruction that hopefully will not be used again for the foreseeable future. They pose a threat to life as we know it.